Trump asked Congress to claw back funding for PBS and NPR. What now?

By Brian Stelter and Liam Reilly, CNN
(CNN) — America’s two big public broadcasters, PBS and NPR, have 45 days to salvage their federal funding — starting now.
On Tuesday, the Trump administration sent Congress a long-awaited request for lawmakers to cancel more than $1 billion in federal funds earmarked for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, CPB for short, ?the entity that disburses taxpayer funds to local NPR and PBS stations across the country.
The unusual request, known as a “rescission package,” starts a 45-day clock for Congress to either approve or ignore the proposal. Rescinding the funds only requires a simple majority, which means in this case that no Democratic votes are needed.
However, Republicans only have slim majorities in both the House and Senate, and public media executives are cautiously hopeful that they can convince some Republican moderates to ignore the White House’s proposal, thereby killing it.
One Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, is already on the record as opposing President Trump’s effort to claw back CPB’s funding.
Last month, she called the public media system an “invaluable resource that saves lives in Alaska” and pledged to protect the roughly $12 million that her state’s stations receive.
Many other Republican lawmakers are eager to strip the funding, however. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Tuesday night that he will put the rescission proposal on the floor next week.
Earlier in the day, White House budget director Russ Vought appeared on Fox News to promote the proposal and warn any possibly wayward Republicans, “If it doesn’t pass, we have to then release the funds and it has to be spent.”
The 45-day period for passage will end on July 18. Until then, PBS and NPR officials will be lobbying lawmakers and counting votes. In fact, the lobbying effort is already underway, starting on the House side, “where we expect the memo to be first taken up,” NPR CEO Katherine Maher said in a memo to staffers.
“During this fight we will demonstrate our value to Congress,” PBS CEO Paula Kerger said in a statement, “as we have over the last 50 years, in providing educational, enriching programs and critical services to all Americans every day for free.”
Some of the local TV and radio stations that rely on the federal funding are also mobilizing.
New York Public Radio, which operates WNYC and other stations, sent an email labeled “URGENT” to supporters on Tuesday night.
“The House is expected to move quickly, and we must respond immediately and in lockstep to prevent its passage,” the email stated, linking to ways that listeners can contact members of Congress.
The public media funds being targeted now were allocated by the Republican-controlled Congress in a bill that Trump signed into law earlier this spring but haven’t been spent yet because the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is budgeted two years in advance.
Trump, tapping into long-held conservative beliefs that NPR and PBS are biased in favor of liberals, is now trying to strip away the future funding and score a political win.
Kerger said it would be a loss for the public at large. “The proposed rescissions would have a devastating impact on PBS member stations and the essential role they play in communities,” she said, “particularly smaller and rural stations that rely on federal funding for a larger portion of their budgets. Without PBS member stations, Americans will lose unique local programming and emergency services in times of crisis.”
Generally speaking, big stations in major metro areas would weather the loss of taxpayer support because they rely more heavily on donor contributions and other sources of revenue.
Some smaller stations would be forced off the airwaves altogether, operators have said.
Even the bigger stations would suffer because the federal funds help pay for the proverbial foundation of public radio and TV, like the connections between stations across the country.
“To put it bluntly, this is the funding that keeps the lights on, keeps our signals on the air, and keeps the entire public media system working as a whole,” New York Public Radio’s email to supporters stated.
The Trump White House has targeted public media on multiple fronts in recent weeks.
The president signed an executive order in early May directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to stop funding PBS and NPR. He also tried to fire three of the corporation’s board members.
The corporation has essentially ignored him, however, because it is a private nonprofit entity set up by Congress and historically insulated from presidential interference. The entity has filed suit with the hopes that a federal court will affirm its independence.
All three cases have been assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss, who has yet to issue any rulings.
Furthermore, the Federal Communications Commission is conducting a probe into NPR and PBS member stations, citing concerns that public media underwriting messages may be violating federal law.
But of all the attempts to target public media this year, Tuesday’s proposal stands out.
“This rescission proposal is the most serious threat ever faced by public broadcasting,” Maher wrote in her statement. “We urge Congress to act in the interest of their constituents and save public broadcasting.”
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.